Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
-
- Former Server Admin
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:01 pm
- Location: Romania , Bucharest
Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
Ok guys , i'm with Call of duty
I bought all cod games since modern warfare 1 was launched , now recently i bought Black ops 2 and it's amazing
I also bought BF 3 but for me sucks , i can't understand the game , can't understand maps, weapons....
Also maps are tooooooooooooo long ..
Sorry to say that but in my opinion Cod games are better than BF
What's your favorite ? And why ? Which one you thins is better ?
I bought all cod games since modern warfare 1 was launched , now recently i bought Black ops 2 and it's amazing
I also bought BF 3 but for me sucks , i can't understand the game , can't understand maps, weapons....
Also maps are tooooooooooooo long ..
Sorry to say that but in my opinion Cod games are better than BF
What's your favorite ? And why ? Which one you thins is better ?
Re: Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
Black Ops 2.B.U.G wrote:Ok guys , i'm with Call of duty
I bought all cod games since modern warfare 1 was launched , now recently i bought Black ops 2 and it's amazing
I also bought BF 3 but for me sucks , i can't understand the game , can't understand maps, weapons....
Also maps are tooooooooooooo long ..
Sorry to say that but in my opinion Cod games are better than BF
What's your favorite ? And why ? Which one you thins is better ?
-
- Former Server Admin
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
You should not compare CoD and BF, cause it's two different games, but i prefer playing CoD.
I've played all the CoD games, even the first one simply called "Call of Duty."
Sadly the new ain't as good as they used to be. I was a pretty good player in MW1 & MW2, but didn't enjoy the games came after BO1, mw3, BO2.
I've played all the CoD games, even the first one simply called "Call of Duty."
Sadly the new ain't as good as they used to be. I was a pretty good player in MW1 & MW2, but didn't enjoy the games came after BO1, mw3, BO2.
Crushed dreams and broken hearts!
Patience is a small price to pay for perfection.
словами не передать
Patience is a small price to pay for perfection.
словами не передать
-
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 4:36 pm
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
Can't compare BF and CoD. Two different kind of games. But i personally like BF the most.
Demon wrote:Comments
-
- Former Server Admin
- Posts: 2432
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:37 pm
- Location: France
Re: Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
2 differents kind of games, can't compare it, like said the upper posters...
For my choice, I prefer BF3.I only played it a few hours on the PC of my friend and the Xbox of my brother, it's a very nice game.Tactical, action FPS, nice maps, nice weapons, well, all, and if i could play it on my computer i would lol.
I played every game called Call Of Duty on my PC.Multiplayer and campaign.
FRom the 1 to Modern Warfar 2, the last really "new" and fun CoD.
BO I was shit, MW3 took exactly the same style than MW2, BO II sucks as the one does.Thoses are complete shit from my point of view, no thinking, too little maps, too much noobs, too much trolls like this one :
Campaign totally sucks for thoses lasts "Consume & Garbage" CoDs.Like multiplayer, thanks to noobs.
So finally CoD is a nice game if oyu want to stay few hours on the multiplayer, having a little fun, but I'll buy it only on PS3 and if i have money to spend, because lol, in 1 year they don't even take the time to produce a PC version, thats copy/paste from the console one.
That's why I don't like CoD since BO I and prefer BF3 even if I played it rarely.
Please don't make a shitstorm of it, I just gave my opinion.No harsh arguing there.
For my choice, I prefer BF3.I only played it a few hours on the PC of my friend and the Xbox of my brother, it's a very nice game.Tactical, action FPS, nice maps, nice weapons, well, all, and if i could play it on my computer i would lol.
I played every game called Call Of Duty on my PC.Multiplayer and campaign.
FRom the 1 to Modern Warfar 2, the last really "new" and fun CoD.
BO I was shit, MW3 took exactly the same style than MW2, BO II sucks as the one does.Thoses are complete shit from my point of view, no thinking, too little maps, too much noobs, too much trolls like this one :
People is still buying that shit that we call CoD but who's in fact a real shit, copy/pasting games, just changing a minimum of graphics, some hidden racism and pro-americanism, propaganda for the US Army even if the US Army isn't like this at all...Just changing weapons look and maps looks.B.U.G wrote:Ok guys , i'm with Call of duty
I bought all cod games since modern warfare 1 was launched , now recently i bought Black ops 2 and it's amazing
I also bought BF 3 but for me sucks , i can't understand the game , can't understand maps, weapons....
Also maps are tooooooooooooo long ..
Sorry to say that but in my opinion Cod games are better than BF
What's your favorite ? And why ? Which one you thins is better ?
Campaign totally sucks for thoses lasts "Consume & Garbage" CoDs.Like multiplayer, thanks to noobs.
So finally CoD is a nice game if oyu want to stay few hours on the multiplayer, having a little fun, but I'll buy it only on PS3 and if i have money to spend, because lol, in 1 year they don't even take the time to produce a PC version, thats copy/paste from the console one.
That's why I don't like CoD since BO I and prefer BF3 even if I played it rarely.
Please don't make a shitstorm of it, I just gave my opinion.No harsh arguing there.
-
- Server Admin
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:26 pm
- Location: Poland
Re: Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
Easy stuff compared to thisXseba360 wrote:BF3. 'nuff said.
John Freeman wrote:2 differents kind of games, can't compare it, like said the upper posters...
For my choice, I prefer BF3.I only played it a few hours on the PC of my friend and the Xbox of my brother, it's a very nice game.Tactical, action FPS, nice maps, nice weapons, well, all, and if i could play it on my computer i would lol.
I played every game called Call Of Duty on my PC.Multiplayer and campaign.
FRom the 1 to Modern Warfar 2, the last really "new" and fun CoD.
BO I was shit, MW3 took exactly the same style than MW2, BO II sucks as the one does.Thoses are complete shit from my point of view, no thinking, too little maps, too much noobs, too much trolls like this one :People is still buying that shit that we call CoD but who's in fact a real shit, copy/pasting games, just changing a minimum of graphics, some hidden racism and pro-americanism, propaganda for the US Army even if the US Army isn't like this at all...Just changing weapons look and maps looks.B.U.G wrote:Ok guys , i'm with Call of duty
I bought all cod games since modern warfare 1 was launched , now recently i bought Black ops 2 and it's amazing
I also bought BF 3 but for me sucks , i can't understand the game , can't understand maps, weapons....
Also maps are tooooooooooooo long ..
Sorry to say that but in my opinion Cod games are better than BF
What's your favorite ? And why ? Which one you thins is better ?
Campaign totally sucks for thoses lasts "Consume & Garbage" CoDs.Like multiplayer, thanks to noobs.
So finally CoD is a nice game if oyu want to stay few hours on the multiplayer, having a little fun, but I'll buy it only on PS3 and if i have money to spend, because lol, in 1 year they don't even take the time to produce a PC version, thats copy/paste from the console one.
That's why I don't like CoD since BO I and prefer BF3 even if I played it rarely.
Please don't make a shitstorm of it, I just gave my opinion.No harsh arguing there.
-
- Server Admin
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:50 am
-
- Former Server Admin
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
*claps*Nicdel wrote:Both suck compared to HL2.
Crushed dreams and broken hearts!
Patience is a small price to pay for perfection.
словами не передать
Patience is a small price to pay for perfection.
словами не передать
-
- Former Server Admin
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:07 am
Re: Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
Cod= For kids who likes instantly action all the time with only shooting and no tactics. Doesn't require much brain power, only aim and shoot. The fastest responder usually wins.
BF3= For adults who actually can plan attacks and live up to a realistic warfare.
BF3= For adults who actually can plan attacks and live up to a realistic warfare.
-
- Former Server Admin
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:40 pm
Re: Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
Battlefield 2 is way better than the third.
I think they had a new engine for the last one, and they made it very fail-realistic = less realist than bf2 in my opinion.
Oh and should i say that the intro screen + every other screens are VERY dangerous for epileptics? xD
COD > BF3
BF2 > BF3
BF2 > COD
BF2 > COD > BF3
a²+b²=c² pls.
I think they had a new engine for the last one, and they made it very fail-realistic = less realist than bf2 in my opinion.
Oh and should i say that the intro screen + every other screens are VERY dangerous for epileptics? xD
COD > BF3
BF2 > BF3
BF2 > COD
BF2 > COD > BF3
a²+b²=c² pls.
Keep in mind that what i say is not static, it is dynamic.
Years, months, weeks, and days after i say something, i can say the opposite.
Years, months, weeks, and days after i say something, i can say the opposite.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4390
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 3:20 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
No fucking way... BF3 all the way.B.U.G wrote:Ok guys , i'm with Call of duty
I bought all cod games since modern warfare 1 was launched , now recently i bought Black ops 2 and it's amazing
I also bought BF 3 but for me sucks , i can't understand the game , can't understand maps, weapons....
Also maps are tooooooooooooo long ..
Sorry to say that but in my opinion Cod games are better than BF
What's your favorite ? And why ? Which one you thins is better ?
But i will say, yes is does take a LONG time to understand all the maps, weapons, etc., so you need to really be committed to playing and prepare for a very low KDR in the beginning.
ExactlyCpt.Travis wrote:Cod= For kids who likes instantly action all the time with only shooting and no tactics. Doesn't require much brain power, only aim and shoot. The fastest responder usually wins.
BF3= For adults who actually can plan attacks and live up to a realistic warfare.
-
- 1000+ Posts
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
I don't have either of these games, but I have been thinking of getting one of them. Which one do you guys think is better for snipers?
Spoiler
Show
Saying "Your lucky i'm peaceful" is pretty much like saying "when i grow up i wanna be an arms race!"-HL2shadowslayer, Area 51 Minecraft
-
- Former Server Admin
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:40 pm
Re: Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
In BF-3 i think there's less gears for snipers, am i right?shadowslayer wrote:I don't have either of these games, but I have been thinking of getting one of them. Which one do you guys think is better for snipers?
Keep in mind that what i say is not static, it is dynamic.
Years, months, weeks, and days after i say something, i can say the opposite.
Years, months, weeks, and days after i say something, i can say the opposite.
-
- Former Server Admin
- Posts: 2432
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:37 pm
- Location: France
Re: Call Of Duty vs Battlefield
Get BF3.There is snipers rifles, and pretty powerful and realistic.There could be less "sniper" stuff than in CoD, but at least you are useful for oyur team in BF3 when you play with a sniper.Plus, the maps are nicely done for all kinds of classes : The assault take vehicles to get close to the enemies, the sniper can stay far.Well, at my point of view, BF3 owns the last CoDs everywhere.shadowslayer wrote:I don't have either of these games, but I have been thinking of getting one of them. Which one do you guys think is better for snipers?
As said thoses 2 guys who suceed to say in few words my opinion :
Spoiler
Show
Cpt.Travis wrote:Cod= For kids who likes instantly action all the time with only shooting and no tactics. Doesn't require much brain power, only aim and shoot. The fastest responder usually wins.
BF3= For adults who actually can plan attacks and live up to a realistic warfare.
ant_8490 wrote:No fucking way... BF3 all the way.B.U.G wrote:Ok guys , i'm with Call of duty
I bought all cod games since modern warfare 1 was launched , now recently i bought Black ops 2 and it's amazing
I also bought BF 3 but for me sucks , i can't understand the game , can't understand maps, weapons....
Also maps are tooooooooooooo long ..
Sorry to say that but in my opinion Cod games are better than BF
What's your favorite ? And why ? Which one you thins is better ?
But i will say, yes is does take a LONG time to understand all the maps, weapons, etc., so you need to really be committed to playing and prepare for a very low KDR in the beginning.
ExactlyCpt.Travis wrote:Cod= For kids who likes instantly action all the time with only shooting and no tactics. Doesn't require much brain power, only aim and shoot. The fastest responder usually wins.
BF3= For adults who actually can plan attacks and live up to a realistic warfare.
Therefore I know some adults that play CoDs and some teens that play BF3.State of mind is actually the answer...BF3 is tactical, teamplaying, harder, more realistic, than CoD.CoD is just a fast game where you shoot on sight and where noobs are everywhere.They're just taking old weapons, maps, and other feature, gave them a new look, and hup it's online for being buying by a herd of kids.
Don't even take the time to make a PC version, and just that fact, I say stfu to CoD.