-ticeExorcist wrote:an appology like an application im so funnywarmage45 wrote:I don't see what you did with the title.
an appology and a apply
Forum rules
- This is to apply for basic admin on the Deathrun Server.
- Make sure you have fully read the "[MUST READ] Admin Requirements" post first, before applying for admin.
- This is to apply for basic admin on the Deathrun Server.
- Make sure you have fully read the "[MUST READ] Admin Requirements" post first, before applying for admin.
-
- 500+ Posts
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:45 pm
Re:Exo plz. check the subject title.Someone probably wont no
-
- 250+ Posts
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:41 pm
Re: an appology and a apply
whats the point of being neutral. its a yes or no answer, idc if you say yes or no. but answering with neutral is not one of the answers you should provide. its a yes or no question, not neutral. it is really stupid imo because people never change it unless you play with them 2 times. which imo again isnt enough. just say no if your neutral because you obviously do not know me enough to say yes or nowNightmare-Rex wrote:for now Netural
&&[GR]Broskii{A}:L: is it lego's boobs?
-
- Former Server Admin
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:37 pm
- Location: Temple of Prime, outside of Cairo.
Re: an appology and a apply
Well, some people believe you have done more than lie, which I, myself, find bullshit to believe. No problem with you, except you saying your age was a different. I wouldn't have any problem with you becoming admin, but I am sure Ant does...the reason why I think Ant may say no is that admins should be trustworthy and honest, so server and staff can run effectively. However, I doubt the Age part would really matter much, but it would be a step deeper into Ant not believeing his admins if they would lie even about their age.Exorcist wrote:
whats the point of being neutral. its a yes or no answer, idc if you say yes or no. but answering with neutral is not one of the answers you should provide. its a yes or no question, not neutral. it is really stupid imo because people never change it unless you play with them 2 times. which imo again isnt enough. just say no if your neutral because you obviously do not know me enough to say yes or now
Just saying what I think. But still, you are a mature fucker who would not go straight for the ban hammer. Gut 4 u boy! But anyways, I believe he should recieve admin solong as he is under watch, by the Big Brother, if ya know what I mean
Spoiler
Show
Spoiler
Show
Spoiler
Show
-
- Former Server Admin
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:07 am
Re: an appology and a apply
Thats one of the reasons why I am voting no, because whats the point of being an admin in area51 if you think that the owners are crap?Exorcist wrote:with those admins being said the bad admins, sorry to point out but yeah
BAD ADMINS Reasons
ant Threatened everybody who plays my server with a ban/admin removal
nick look at ants
Later on that post you also wrote:
Ever since you wrote that you have acted like an asshole in-game to some of the admins, players and especially me for no reason at all.and my last note to nick and ant, dick moves deserve dick things...
So here is my question to Ant, why would you add an admin like Exorcist after that being said + his jackass behaviour?
I also would like to add this:
We had a period when the server had a downtime because of sandy and few days after there were only a few players playing. So after that happend you just left your admin position and quit playing in area51.
Like I would atleast expect an admin to still play even thou the server have downtimes and not just quit and leave everything behind. Then a few days later you posted a topic about the problems around and in one of your posts in that topic you wrote.
Which just enormously annoyed me. Like what happend to being supportive? So you just immidiatly quit when you feel something is unorganized?Exorcist wrote: until the server is organized again, im out
- exo
-
- 250+ Posts
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:41 pm
Re: an appology and a apply
Cpt.Travis wrote:Thats one of the reasons why I am voting no, because whats the point of being an admin in area51 if you think that the owners are crap?Exorcist wrote:with those admins being said the bad admins, sorry to point out but yeah
BAD ADMINS Reasons
ant Threatened everybody who plays my server with a ban/admin removal
nick look at ants
Later on that post you also wrote:Ever since you wrote that you have acted like an asshole in-game to some of the admins, players and especially me for no reason at all.and my last note to nick and ant, dick moves deserve dick things...
So here is my question to Ant, why would you add an admin like Exorcist after that being said + his jackass behaviour?
travis, im sorry but you dont understand alot of things do you, im not acting like an asshole bro, its not my fault your more sensitive than others. and travis i have nothing against you nor do i hate the owners, but what i do hate is you, you were so much better back in 2010, but now idk what to say about you. your letting this game get to the better of you, and also saying "ill beat you in game and irl" can be also translated as ill beat you in game(winning) and beat you in real life(beat you up) is kind of threatening, im not taking it that way, but just watch what you say
&&[GR]Broskii{A}:L: is it lego's boobs?
-
- Former Server Admin
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:07 am
Re: an appology and a apply
Actually that's just pretty much a irrelevant post. Because we could be going all day like that where I would say that it was a jackass move what you did earlier in the server while you could say that I am a sensitive person and that you are not a jackass. You can't be the judge of that and that's not even the main reason why I am voting no. The main reason was above.Cpt.Travis wrote:travis, im sorry but you dont understand alot of things do you, im not acting like an asshole bro, its not my fault your more sensitive than others. and travis i have nothing against you nor do i hate the owners, but what i do hate is you, you were so much better back in 2010, but now idk what to say about you. your letting this game get to the better of you, and also saying "ill beat you in game and irl" can be also translated as ill beat you in game(winning) and beat you in real life(beat you up) is kind of threatening, im not taking it that way, but just watch what you sayExorcist wrote:Thats one of the reasons why I am voting no, because whats the point of being an admin in area51 if you think that the owners are crap?Exorcist wrote:with those admins being said the bad admins, sorry to point out but yeah
BAD ADMINS Reasons
ant Threatened everybody who plays my server with a ban/admin removal
nick look at ants
Later on that post you also wrote:Ever since you wrote that you have acted like an asshole in-game to some of the admins, players and especially me for no reason at all.and my last note to nick and ant, dick moves deserve dick things...
So here is my question to Ant, why would you add an admin like Exorcist after that being said + his jackass behaviour?
I also would like to add this:
We had a period when the server had a downtime because of sandy and few days after there were only a few players playing. So after that happend you just left your admin position and quit playing in area51.
Like I would atleast expect an admin to still play even thou the server have downtimes and not just quit and leave everything behind. Then a few days later you posted a topic about the problems around and in one of your posts in that topic you wrote.
Which just enormously annoyed me. Like what happend to being supportive? So you just immidiatly quit when you feel something is unorganized?Exorcist wrote: until the server is organized again, im out
- exo
My post was redicted to Ant and not you. So there is really no need to make 10 new posts regardless if you disagree or not because it's my view and you can't change that.
Re: an appology and a apply
I would have to vote "Yes." Because of the way he acts (mature) and the amount of times he has played.
P.S. Travis, you shouldn't talk like that, considering that this is an application, therefore it's not a place to argue, it's a place to VOTE.
P.S. Travis, you shouldn't talk like that, considering that this is an application, therefore it's not a place to argue, it's a place to VOTE.
-
- Former Server Admin
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:20 pm
Re: an appology and a apply
I agree with Lego, so Yes.
Re: an appology and a apply
I will have to disagree.DiehardLego wrote:I would have to vote "Yes." Because of the way he acts (mature) and the amount of times he has played.
P.S. Travis, you shouldn't talk like that, considering that this is an application, therefore it's not a place to argue, it's a place to VOTE.
As admin, you have to vote and explain.
You'll have to argue in anyway to defend your explanations.
Re: an appology and a apply
Well, I guess you are kind-of right, but saying all those mean things, those werent needed at all, for it doesn't change most people's views of him.
Re: an appology and a apply
Travis were only saying his opinions.DiehardLego wrote:Well, I guess you are kind-of right, but saying all those mean things, those werent needed at all, for it doesn't change most people's views of him.
Re: an appology and a apply
That wasn't the point of my reply... Just get back to voting please.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4390
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 3:20 pm
- Location: United States
Re: an appology and a apply
none of it was mean. Just facts/opinions.DiehardLego wrote:Well, I guess you are kind-of right, but saying all those mean things, those werent needed at all, for it doesn't change most people's views of him.
Re: an appology and a apply
If Travis had talked to me like that, I would have felt like it was aggresive/rude. Sooo.. idk I was just trying to back him up.
Re: an appology and a apply
Stop me if I'm wrong but admin application are voting, setting your opinion(s), defending your opinion(s) with arguments.ant_8490 wrote:none of it was mean. Just facts/opinions.DiehardLego wrote:Well, I guess you are kind-of right, but saying all those mean things, those werent needed at all, for it doesn't change most people's views of him.